The Ring and the other races

[obloquy]

Thanks, Lego. That's the bit I was referring to and it's just how I remembered it. Tolkien's belief is that the Ring would continue to corrupt even after Sauron is overthrown.

But doesn't this open up a can of worms in regard to the created nature of Sauron's spirit? If the power he invested in the Ring was evil independent of his will or his existence, wouldn't the implication be that Sauron was, by nature, evil? Or was the impotent spirit that Sauron would become (since we know no spirit could be wholly destroyed except by Eru) enough to keep the Ring's malice persistent?

Thoughts?

It occurs to me now that Tolkien was not saying Gandalf would be corrupted to evil, but that Gandalf would be capable of too much good. He would direct his subjects according to his superior wisdom--for their own good, of course--and in this way he would deprive them of their free will.

[The Saucepan Man]

Originally Posted by obloquy

Or was the impotent spirit that Sauron would become (since we know no spirit could be wholly destroyed except by Eru) enough to keep the Ring's malice persistent?

That's my reading of what Tolkien is saying. Which, in a way, makes the creation of the Ring a "win-win" scenario for Sauron, doesn't it? At least until the final battle.

Originally Posted by obloquy

It occurs to me now that Tolkien was not saying Gandalf would be corrupted to evil, but that Gandalf would be capable of too much good. He would direct his subjects according to his superior wisdom--for their own good, of course--and in this way he would deprive them of their free will.

But isn't that evil by another name? If it is undesirable to those (good people) affected by it, imposed on them by force and, most importantly, contrary to the will of Eru (denial of free will), then surely it falls within Tolkien's conception of evil.

[obloquy]

But isn't that evil by another name?

I think this is exactly what Tolkien means when he says that Gandalf would blur the lines of good and evil and thus be worse than Sauron.

So, Tolkien was looking farther into the future than I was. The Ring can be mastered and used for good, but ultimately, the bearer's self-righteous imposition of his wisdom on others would be tantamount to enslavement.

[Noxomanus]

How would a Dragon wear the One Ring? The Ring adjusted it's size to it's bearer, so we could expect a Ring the size of a hoola-hoop

[Gurthang]

The ring changed its size to make itself appear more desirable to whoever held it. Isildur said it seemed to change shape in his hand, and he took it for himself. A dragon would only keep the ring because it was gold and they keep gold. They don't use what they keep, they just keep it to have it.

So a person would say, "Oh, here's a pretty little ring, and it's just my size!", and then keep it.

But a dragon would say, "Oh, here's a pretty hula-hoop. It will go good with my collection.", and toss it onto his mountain of treasure and forget about it.

The dragon would not use the ring, so the ring would have little reason to change its size to be desirable to the dragon.

[The Saucepan Man]

Originally Posted by Gurthang

The dragon would not use the ring, so the ring would have little reason to change its size to be desirable to the dragon.

Surely if the Ring saw the Dragon as a means of getting back to its Master, it would seek to entice the Dragon into wearing it. There is much that the Ring could promise a Dragon. What makes you think that the Dragon would have the strength of will to resist it?

[Gurthang]

I thought that Dragons had very strong wills, and could daunt even the toughest warriors just by gazing at them. I know they have the ability to cast spells with their eyes, and then almost control another's will. It would only make sense then that they had strong wills themselves. I could be wrong though.