![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
I am not adamant on any addition I did. But I still think we should name the Battle of Nan-Tathren or we should make a refference to defeats that the Elves suffered in the long time of the war. I think that it would be nice iluminat the "long and bitterly they contested the passage" of Sirion. And the only thinks that could do so are the Battle of Nan-Tathren and the Battle of the Pools. Since we agree that the Battle of the Pools is the riskier one, I would think that is even more an argument to use the Battle of Nan-Tathren. But if it even that is found to risky we should at least try to emphasis the period of time that elapsed during the contest of the passage of Sirion. But in the moment I can not see how we could do it.
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Maedhros, what do you think? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Kinslayer
|
Quote:
I'm not even sure as to we should use the battle in Nan-Tathren material myself. If you or Findegil could propose a way to do so without compromising the canonicity of it, I would be fine with it. I think that more impartant that this, is to try and finish off the other points like the Gil-Galad position. Regarding Gil-Galad, I think now that after some months of thinking about it, I think that it would be best if we follow Aiwendil's suggestion.
__________________
"Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Maedhros:
I also would rather go with eliminating the Nan-Tathren battle completely. I'm pleased that you now agree with my suggestion on the Gil-Galad issue (though to be honest I had to wade through quite a bit of the early discussion to recall the details of that issue). I've been thinking about Lindil's concern back then regarding the kingship passing from the house of Fingolfin to the house of Finarfin without much gravity, and I do think I can sympathize with that concern now. But unless I'm mistaken we needn't actually come right out and say that Gil-Galad inherited the High Kingship; he is called a king of the Noldor, but it can be left ambiguous whether this is in fact the kingship of all the Noldor. "King" in the restricted sense still need not conflict with Earendil's "lordship" over the exiles of Gondolin. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
![]() |
Okay, so the War of Wrath is settled: we take the additions from Ab but skip that of LT. Thus we have:
Forum formatted: Quote:
Quote:
But it seems to me that Aiwendil did know doubt the decision of Gil-Galad being the son of Orordreth. Would it be a solution to change him from a High-King of the Noldor in Middle-Earth only to a King of the Noldor at Sirions Mouth? (That does not mean that he could not become High-King later in the Second Age, when he is clearly the most might King of the Elves in Middle-Earth.) I tried to re-read the thread to get hold of all the not settle issues, but finishing it I could not remeber them all. (Maybe I was to tired.) At least some of my additions to the voyages of Eärendil have nither been rejecte nor approved finaly. Respectfully Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 08-10-2004 at 03:22 PM. Reason: Cured a formation fault. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
![]() ![]() |
Findegil wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|