![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Everlasting Whiteness
|
But the aversion wasn't meaningless! Gollum is supposed to be this creature that while once good is now intrinsically evil. As elves are meant to be like the embodiment of all things good then Gollum being unable to touch things made by them would actually be a good way to show his nature.
__________________
“If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Banshee of Camelot
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 5,830
![]() |
Quote:
"Frodo broke off a portion of a wafer and handed it to him on its leaf-wrapping" where as in the sequence on the DVD, Frodo broke off a tiny bit and flung it (without leaf wrapper) in Gollum's direction, so he had to pick it up from the ground. This seems perhaps a small change, but it annoys me because it shows such a different attitude! In the movie Frodo shows contempt and disgust of Gollum ("Don't touch me!") but Book- Frodo showed pity and the real wish to help Gollum: Quote:
__________________
Yes! "wish-fulfilment dreams" we spin to cheat our timid hearts, and ugly Fact defeat! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Raffish Rapscallion
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Far from the 'Downs, it seems :-(
Posts: 2,835
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Everlasting Whiteness
|
Hmm, I suppose thats a good reason for it to be left out, though it would have made Gollums character more layered. I think thats why it really bothers me, that its supposed to be evil gollum and good smeagol. But in this scene he is smeagol still, and yet he's evil. Ooh then thats actually really good. Ignore all previous statements as I have just got where PJ was heading with this!
__________________
“If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|