![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#11 | ||||||
Wight
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 129
![]() |
![]() Quote:
If you consider the Silmarillion to be one of JRR's works, then why do you consider the Silmarillion a more important work than Morgoth's Ring? Quote:
Tolkien was writing a myth that revealed the truth of this world. It didn't have to do with what was within Tolkien. He was not creating mere fantasy. He was trying to describe how the world actually works. If your understanding of that quote from the Silmarillion is correct, then how could there be a 'fallen state'? If no matter what we do, we are following Eru's plan, how could anything we do be outside that plan? The only way that I can see that quote fitting into the theme of the 'fallen state' is through the concept of sub-creation. I believe that is why Tolkien wrote so much about that topic. Through the concept of sub-creation (Eru giving a part of his power to create to his own creation) Tolkien was able to give the created beings the ability to 'fall', while having that ability to 'fall' originating with Eru. Each being is not some part of Eru's personality. Each being is seperate and distinct, but its powers originate with Eru's power. All Eru was telling Morgoth was that no matter what Morgoth tried to create out of the 'good' power Eru entrusted him with, the end result must be 'good'. Morgoth tried to do his own thing and fell. That makes Morgoth evil. Although it may appear for a time that Melkor had succeeded, Eru's creations did not have the power to corrupt the power that Eru entrusted his creation with. Quote:
In other words, nothing is an original creation. Clearly, this is not the case. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
For by your words you will be justified and by your words you will be condemned ~Matthew 12:37 |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |