WW LXXIII: Arkham Asylum: Holding Cells(Game Thread)

[Nogrod]

Kitalysis ("kita" in Finnish means roughly "a gaping mouth", like one of a wild beast )


DAY 1

#18
Shortly coming into the discussion with two short comments.

#40
Doesn't understand the discussion of a Boro-train and says most comments have been wishy-washy and thence easy places for wolves to hide. Questions Boro's touchiness.

#81
Says she can only make a few hurried comments - and gives a full page of analysis...
Suspects Boro for overreacting and Lottie for the "hint-issue".

The final reason for her vote on Lottie was:

Originally Posted by Kit

As I said above she took hold of the hinting idea that Glirdan appears to have put forth as a joke. This did stir up conversation, but at the same time Loslote didn't commit to the idea one way or the other. This sort of vague, flip-flipping is an easy way to hide a baddie on Day 1.

DAY 2

#140
Starts the Day with a voting analysis that ends up with the following:

So...who looks the worst?
I'm assuming I'll be looked at because I cast the first vote for Loslote.
But I think Durelin, Glirdan, and Wilwa to some extent look the worst.

I don't like the middle-line.

Dury and Glirdy are her suspects because of their votes to bring Lottie over Wilwa and that is understandable logic. Her reason to include Wilwa is a more interesting one. She says she wouldn't put it past Wilwa to vote for Boro and then kill him at Night to daringly bluff herself to look innocent. I do think this quite far-fetched indeed and do wonder whether there could be something there revealing some thought processes of the wolves?

#143
She corrects her error after Dury notified her of it (that Dury had listed Lottie as a wolf early on D1 contrary to what she had said). But the interesting part here is the explanation why she had not seen that post by Dury:

I was rushed and focused on Nogrod, Glirdan and myself when I was rereading.

Now that is interesting. She said of me in her analysis:

Nogrod: voted Pitch, didn't really give a reason in the vote post (I'll dig it up later I suppose)

!!!
I think I discussed Pitch quite a many times in quite a many posts yesterDay and she hadn't noticed it although she said she had read the thread focusing on me (with Glirdy and herself?). And what does it mean that you read the thread focusing on yourself? A wolf would focus on the impression she gives or how others talk of you... There is something wrong here.

#153
Makes a lengthy analysis on Glirdan and concludes that he is suspicious. Comes up with alternate theories of Glirdy and Wilwa being either wolf-wolf or wolf-innocent. Ends up with:

I feel like Glirdan's interaction with Wilwa and his vote for Lottie (vote placement especially) are too neat and tidy.

#155
Makes a lengthy analysis on Wilwa and concludes there is nothing overwhelmingly suspicious in her (so bye-bye G&W wolves-theory then?).

Wilwa provides a good blend of silly and serious for Day 1. Though she raises my eyebrows because of how she goes from defense to attack (for Boro and Lottie specifically), but it doesn't feel sinister to me. I'm not inclined to trust Wilwa just yet, but I'll be moving my suspicions to the back-burner at present.

A short break now. Then some comments. A vote. And to bed.