|
 |
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
11-06-2006, 08:37 PM
|
#23 |
|
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
 |
Re-reading this thread I noticed something - in note 65 to the "Shibboleth", it is stated that in a note associated with the text, the Sindarization of "Ambarussa" is given as "Amros" rather than "Amras".
Does this mean that we should be implementing a general change Amras > Amros? Or is there a later instance of "Amras" that nullifies the change? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode