![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#33 | |||||
Laconic Loreman
|
![]()
I found a little more to shed some further light on the Barrow-blade and could other weapons have killed the Witch-King. Now this quote I find particularly interesting:
Quote:
Now what Gandalf tells in The Ring goes South: Quote:
But, I think the Blade of the Westernesse had the effect that no other blade did. The Westernesse sword is repeatedly talked about being 'wound with spells' and 'breaking spells.': Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What I think is that the Blade of the Westernesse was able to break the 'spell,' the spell holding his will and Sauron's will together...'breaking the spell that knit his unseen sinews to his will.' So would this mean that the Witch-King, after being finished off and killed by Eowyn, would be unable to return back? The 'spell' was broken,' and the Blade of the Westernesse did what it was supposed to it brought the destruction of the Witch-King. So, it seems to me that any sword could have killed/dispatched the Witch-King...I mean Aragorn could just chop off his head right? But, it would not have been a wound so 'bitter' that it 'broke the spell' and brought the downfall of the Witch-King, like the Westernesse Blade was specifically made to do. It just didn't make sense to me why The Witch-King would fear Boromir if he couldn ot be harmed by ANY other blade. I can see why he feared Glorfindel, or Gandalf, who knew of Elbereth, and some of the Ringwraith's fears, but why would the WK fear Boromir unless if he actually could be harmed by other blades. It was just the specific Blade of the Westernesse that was able to destroy and harm the Witch-King the way no other sword could have. Comments? This is just kind of something I've been trying to figure out lately. ![]()
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |