![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#12 | ||
Dread Horseman
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,744
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Analyses in Books in the far distant past used to treat the texts on their own terms, almost as history rather than literature. Though this still occurs from time to time, nowadays literary-criticism type analysis is the order of the day in the deeper threads. It's interesting how this shift has mirrored the evolution of the secondary literature in a way -- remember back when secondary Tolkien literature meant Foster's Middle-earth companion, Fonstad's Atlas, I.C.E.'s Middle-earth Roleplaying game (MERP), the odd book on learning Elvish? These were all creative responses to Tolkien, however flawed. Now -- literally dozens of texts analyzing Middle-earth, its meaning, its symbols, its influences and history. Even Christopher went through this arc -- Silmarillion to History of Middle-earth. For my tastes, the analyses are a lesser response. In fact I'm hardly interested in them at all, and don't own a single "analysis of Tolkien" type text. Learning about sources and inspirations of a favorite author can lead you to many interesting works. But in my opinion, if you read Tolkien's inspirations (or supposed inspirations) primarily with an eye out for how they influenced the professor, you're doing both Tolkien and the original work a disservice. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |