![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pennsylvania, WtR, passed Sarn Gebir: Above the rapids (1239 miles) BtR, passed Black Rider Stopping Place (31 miles)
Posts: 1,548
![]() |
![]()
The genesis for this thread is twofold:
1) My bemusement at many (including, in one of his Letters, JRRT) questioning why the nazgul were "put-off" by crossing rivers 2)an article in the book by the people behind TheOneRing.net entitled "More Peoples Guide to J. R. R. Tolkien" by Erica Challis. As for the former, it seems to me quite possible that it was the power of Ulmo that was a deterrent to Middle-earth bad guys venturing over, on, in water bodies, not just in the Third Age, but overall. Recall that Cirdan, even in Beleriand, never had to deal with threats from the sea. And the article "Secret Messengers", by Erica Challis' non de plume Tehanu, generally mentions three forces of good (light, air, and water) but focuses on water, observing that from the beginning of the awakening of men it was Ulmo, through messages sent through the sound of water that stirred them. And she perceptively remarks on an event I've always found most interesting in LOTR: Quote:
rivers (above all Sirien and Anduin) play key roles in the topography and events of Middle-earth. Two examples: the Shire being (effectively) an island, which, when Sam crosses the Brandywine, feels as though he is leaving his world behind. And Elrond using water to thwart the nazgul at the Fords of Bruinen. There are of course, numerous other examples of the beneficient effect of water, from Tom Bombadil and Goldberry's realm to Lorien, as well as the negative effects of "polluting" water from Lake Ivrin to the Sea of Nurnen. To what extent, then, is this apparent presence of water as a power for good an indication that the Valar (and specifically Ulmo) have not abandoned Middle-earth to the extent it may seem in the Third Age? And any other comments on this curious primacy of water over other factors as a force for good in Middle-earth?
__________________
Aure Entuluva! Last edited by Tuor of Gondolin; 11-14-2004 at 10:33 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Regal Dwarven Shade
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: A Remote Dwarven Hold
Posts: 3,593
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
I think that water is more than just a symbol, it is something of an all purpose tool.
The Valar can use it as a weapon, a means of communication, and as a means to provide aid. More to follow tomorrow, after I've had some sleep... ![]()
__________________
...finding a path that cannot be found, walking a road that cannot be seen, climbing a ladder that was never placed, or reading a paragraph that has no... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Bittersweet Symphony
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the jolly starship Enterprise
Posts: 1,814
![]() |
It's not only in LotR that water is used to deter evil; fairy folklore says that to escape evil spirits sometimes one only must cross running water, past which they cannot follow. Perhaps Tolkien was drawing from this when he wrote about the Nazgul and Bruinen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The World That Never Was
Posts: 1,232
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() To point out a more general issue of evil being detered by water, you could look back at medieval folklore. Creatures of darkness (vampires, spirits, etc.) were incapable of crossing running water. This may have been something Tolkien drew on when proposing that the Nazgul couldn't (or wouldn't) cross rivers or get near water. Thank'ee, Encaitare, for pointing this out as well. However, this is contradicted at one point in Unfinished Tales, when it is stated that the Nazgul cross the River Isen, and later the Sarn Ford in the south of the Shire. Christopher noted this and marked it down as a slight inconsistancy on his father's part (sadly, I do not have UT with me at the moment, or I would find the exact quote). Water is often used as a symbol for life, with good reason (if you don't get water, you die). Fire, also, can be used as such a symbol, only with an emphasis on renewal and change. You may note in LotR the Nazgul, embodiments of Sauron's evil, fear both of these elements (see "Knife in the Dark" and "Flight to the Ford"). It could represent a fear of life (the Nazgul are "neither living nor dead"), and fear of change, or a resentment of both of these. I came upon this particular theory thanks to a rather proficcient author I know. Here is the precise passage: Quote:
The forces of evil in Middle-earth have always had trouble from Ulmo. It makes sense that the minions of evil would avoid Ulmo's element as much as possible. Also, the power of water can, as in the case of the Ford of Bruinen, be called upon by those with authority for good. Then there's the theory my mom came up with: that the Nazgul are really made of cotton candy, and if they get in water they melt. ![]() Abedithon le, ~ Saphy ~
__________________
The Hitchhiking Ghost |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Curled up on Melko's lap
Posts: 425
![]() |
And do you not know that there is a reason cats dislike water?
![]() It is perhaps no coincidence that Master Tolkien had a hearty and outspoken dislike of cats and, at the same time, liked to used water in his tales to symbolize goodness. The two go hand in hand, at least from my perspective. Tevildo, Prince of Cats
__________________
Now Tevildo was a mighty cat--the mightiest of all--and possessed of an evil spirit,...and he was in Melko's constant following; and that cat had all cats subject to him, and he and his subjects were the chasers and getters of meat for Melko's table. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Bittersweet Symphony
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the jolly starship Enterprise
Posts: 1,814
![]() |
Quote:
Cotton candy Nazgul? I love it! ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |