![]() |
|
|
|
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
|
#1 | |||||
|
Wight
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 128
![]() |
I am posting this thread to explore some ideas about the Firstborn's presense in Valinor. I got this idea while reading debate in another thread over which elven race, the Vanyar or the Noldor, was greater. The Exile was used as evidence against the Noldor, which made me think about whether it really was wrong for them to leave. That led me to question whether the Elves should have ever been in Valinor in the first place.
The Valar brought the Elves to the Undying Lands after much deliberation amongst themselves: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Elves initially didn't even want to go to Valinor: Quote:
To theorize that the Valar were wrong to bring the Quendi to Valinor means to accept the fact that they were not perfect and could make mistakes. Quote:
Perhaps this thought should be another thread entirely, but I find it unconscionable that the Valar did not toss Melkor into the Timeless Void when they had their hands on him this first time. He had already done enough to show he was beyond redemption. Eru created the Quendi to be born in Middle Earth. Let me know what you think about the Valar's presumtion to move them to Valinor. By extension, if it was wrong to bring the elves to Valinor, it was not wrong for the Noldor to leave. The "Fall of the Noldor" then should refer not to the fact that they left, but to the manner in which they left(the Kinslaying at Aqualonde, abandonment of Fingolfin's people, burning of the White Ships at Losgar) and the things that happened to them as a race afterward. I realize this probably sounds a bit like the "black lies of Morgoth" [img]smilies/evil.gif[/img], but I just wanted to get some of your thoughts on this different view of the elves in Valinor. [ November 15, 2002: Message edited by: Keneldil the Polka-dot ]
__________________
"Trust in the ball Jake.....and throw yourself." |
|||||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|