After re-reading: up till toDay, the person who makes the most sense as a wolf– or the least amount of nonsense, perhaps that would be better– is actually
Kath, not
Shasta. Once you stop seeing the placing of the Day 2 vote as a sign of innocence, and look at the vote
itself, it doesn't appear so good after all:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kath
So Lommy voted for Agan and sally. I'm tempted to go the same way. I feel like she was on to something. I haven't looked at sally and she's only just around while I'm disappearing. Therefore:
++AGAN
|
To recap:
Lommy voted
Agan on Day One. She was not attacked that Night. She voted
Sally on Day Two. She was killed the following Night. Which one does that point to? (Hint: not
Agan.)
Now, at that point, there was no telling who'd be lynched– but the next Day, a hypothetical
Kathwolf would have returned to a quite nasty situation– one comrade dead, the other heavily suspected, herself the only one to have cast a vote for someone other than the known wolf, and the person she did vote revealed as the Ranger. I'd say some damage control would have been in order– and this in turn makes her case and early Day 4
Legate-vote look quite a bit less shiny.
So far, so good. Only– again, why on
Earth would a
Kathwolf have eaten
Nogrod last Night– the one person convinced of her innocence? It would make sense to keep me alive, since she'd already got herself into a position where she could vote me toDay without raising any eyebrows– but why make things hard for herself by not eating
Shasta? Whereas killing
Nog and leaving
Kath and me alive would make plenty of sense for a
Shastawolf.