Quote:
Originally Posted by Gothmog, LoB
I'm not sure we have to interpret Frodo's perceptions of the Nazgūl as 'the literal truth'. Granted, during the writing of 'The Lord of the Rings' Tolkien might perhaps envisioned the Ringwraiths as 'invisible men' but Frodo's perception could just as well be remnants of the self-images of the Nazgūl how they saw themselves or wanted to be seen by those who could perceive them as they were.
Sort of similar to the images and impression faded Elves whose bodies had been completely consumed would eventually be able to project to those mortals they would want to come into contact with. Such self-images of the Ringwraiths would, of course, also include clothes, crowns, and whatever else they thought had been important to them in life.
But this doesn't necessarily mean all that stuff was actually *there*.
It is quite clear that the Nazgūl could be harmed by conventional human weaponry but how exactly that worked is unclear. One guesses that part of that has to do with them continuing to interact with 'the physical world' but another great part have to to with the magic imbued in Merry's blade as well as the psychological aspect of the whole thing. The witch-king most likely did really think getting hit by a sword in the middle of his 'face' should get him killed. And thus it did. Or rather it greatly weakened him.
|
I am not sure the witch-king did think being hit by a normal blade would kill him.
I think we have to look back at weathertop to the reaction of the Nazgul when Frodo draws his blade. Two of the Nazgul actually stop and don't make a move for him. Only the Witch King has the courage to still go forward.
I am far from convinced that normal, weapons would harm the Nazgul anymore than they would harm a Balrog.