[Macalaure]

Originally Posted by Ski

That's hardly the point. You accuse the people who went with the Inzil/Nessa trail, regardless of who they accuse (gives them negative points) and credit those who stayed away from it, that's the point.

Since Inzil was innocent, I think I can do that! And even without knowing Nessa's role for certain, I find it very suspicious how a lot of people treated them as if they were one person.

I didn't give any points to people who just stayed away (in fact, that's a flaw in the system), but gave positive points who "publicly renounced" it.

Originally Posted by Skip

Once again: The usual suspects Nessa and Inzil did look very likely to get lynched from early on (as far I can remember anyway),

True, but a significant deal of suspicious behaviour occurred after my vote.

Originally Posted by Skip

But you did consistently award negative points (ie a suspicion) for anyone who favoured either Nessa or Inzil.

That's what you do if you don't have a bias. You should try it sometime.


I noticed that you're accusing me plentifully, but haven't commented on even one item I had against you in the analysis. I will gladly spell it out again if you'd like.

Originally Posted by Pitch

Speaking of Zil, sadly there's not as much to learn from knowing his role as I hoped there would, now I think it over with a clearer mind. OK, we know that the vote that saved Nessa on Day 2 wasn't made by a packmate, but we still don't know whether he was swayed by an innocent or evil Nessa.

This sounds like a cop-out to me.

Originally Posted by Pitch

You call that "a little skirmishing"

In the sense that you didn't suspect me back very much.

Originally Posted by Pitch

together with Boro, whom you only started to suspect because he defended me too much?

That was only one of the reasons.

Originally Posted by Pitch

And I'm beginning to look better all of a sudden exactly why?

Because you didn't turn out as evil based on my analysis than I thought you would. Don't you consider yourself off the hook.