Quote:
Originally Posted by Inziladun
I haven’t examined this thread thoroughly enough to know if this quote has been added already, but it seems to lay the matter to rest.
The Silmarillion Of the Beginning of Days
How much more finality does one require?
|
I’d argue the
The Silmarillion was written before
The Hobbit and set before it by a wide margin. If we take the approach that these are all just translations vs Tolkien’s writings I put very little stock in the finality of its authors.
I mean I can write “my headphones are lost” does this mean I will never find them? Ever? “Lost” only has finality as a euphemism for death. And in Tolkien’s world that’s not even a definite.
Quote:
|
“But what was lost may yet be found”-Gandalf council of Elrond
|
In fact the entire debate about the ring is losing it won’t be good enough. Eventually it’ll be found even from the deepest oceans.
As for shaping it, I easily interpret that as it being in a volcano rock that they chipped away to reveal it.
Is the Arkenstone a Silmaril? I don’t know. I do know arguments against it aren’t the most compelling I’ve read, after reading most of this thread.