Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMisfortuneTeller
At any rate, and as numerous others have noted, Tolkien's studied ambiguity towards -- if not indifference to -- religious practices in his fictional Middle-earth make this fantasy world more universal and acceptable in its appeal, particularly since historic religious traditions -- especially the Single Spook variety -- tend mostly to function as atavistic amplifiers of tribal xenophobia, more often than not engendering fear and loathing of the dreaded "OTHER" than any sort of benign impulse towards human brotherhood.
|
I don't believe you could call Tolkien "indifferent" on the subject. How do you explain the overt worship of Eru, the Prime Creator by the Númenóreans? Or the fact that, according to the
UT essay
Cirion and Eorl, Cirion named Eru in witness to the oaths taken by him and Eorl, and that
Quote:
|
[Cirion's] oath astounded those who heard it, and filled them with awe, and was alone (over and above the venerable tomb) sufficient to hallow the place where it was spoken.
|
Footnote 44
Why did naming Eru in the oath "hallow" the spot, unless the god himself heard the oath, and approved?
As to the last bit of your quote, all I'm going to say is that I do not agree with the basic premise, but that is not a discussion for this forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMisfortuneTeller
Religion in Middle-earth would only have made bad things worse, so kudos to Professor Tolkien for letting the good things get along well enough -- as they usually do -- without this unnecessary encumbrance.
|
I daresay there are some readers who see the workings of 'religion' in the books, whether you do or not, and for them
that is one of the 'good things' in itself.