Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
I don't mean that. We all can see him changing his mind (or him letting us understand he changes his mind). But if he was an innocent, wouldn't he have said that:
"For my initial trust on Form - and my dodgy judgement..."
and not
"For my earlier suspicions - and my dodgy judgement..."
If you're an innocent you do know whether you thought of someone as innocent or suspected that person. If you're a wolf, you can easily miss that, especially as "because of my earlier suspicions" is kind of a general way to put it?
|
How would "For my initial trust..." be a valid reasoning for voting someone?
IIRC
Hui actually had some early suspicion of
Formy, then after pushing (TM) him a bit thought him innocent based on his reactions, then changed his mind again in the eleventh hour. It was a sudden turn, to be sure, with reasoning borrowed from the posts above him, but I can't find fault with the reasoning itself.
I don't get
Legate about quiet wolves & cobbler either - at least for the latter, isn't being quiet kind of the contrary of their job description, i.e. drawing attention from the wolves? Which makes me reluctant to vote either
Formy or
Nilp (although I suppose the latter could be a wolf posing as cobbler...hmm).
Also,
BG hopping on the
Formy train with reasoning borrowed wholesale? *ping*
Right now I feel most like voting
Kath for her misrepresentation of
Hui.