Well, any exeption just underlines the rules, I reckon
For one, I may not be a good judge of animals and their fate in afterlife, being myself a human
For two, in ME, the latter version of what Huan was may be brought in to my add - animal raised by Valar to have ability of speech, but still no fëa
For three, I always had a feeling that hröa≠body and fëa≠mind, or if it does, equality is not precise, it is approximate. As in Christian theology, spirit≠soul, though the terms in layman's mouth may be interchangeable
For four, does the
thought of the quote mean
any thought? For surely, to move about, animals must have nervous systems, brains, and, therefore, some processes resembling thinking process of a human. But I suppose by
thought the abstract thought is meant
But the stress of my previous post should have been more gravely put on
fëar, rather than on matter - though in original plan the union of fëar and hröar was to be eternal, the taint brought into the matter --> hröar by Melkor/Morgoth brought about the need of redemption, and Arda Remade. Hence - all matter as it is now should be destroyed and remade. + Fall of Men (partially caused by effect tainted matter had on fëar of men, for the two affect each other)
But we've been through this
before, haven't we?
PS And I do remember the fox which saw three hobbits sleeping under the three. Just don't ask.