Quote:
|
Yes, there are other footnotes in the text. But this, the comment at hand, was not a footnote.
|
I'm sorry, but i don't understand.
There is Ainulindale C, the full text can be found in home 10, it 's a text without footnote.
But for Ainulindale D, Christopher Tolkien explain that it 's :
Quote:
|
a manuscript of unusual splendour, with illuminated capitals and a beautiful script
|
but nothing about some tapuscript that follows this manuscript.
CRT didn't write the full text but just the changes.
And he wrote about the paragraph 19 :
Quote:
After 'when the vision was taken away' there is a footnote that seems to have been an early addition:
And some have said that the Vision ceased ere the fulfilment of the Dominion of Men and the fading of the Firstborn; wherefore, though the Music is over all, the Valar have not seen as with sight the Later Ages or the ending of the World. Quoth Pengološ.
|
If I follow you , the
is a rejected addition.
Can you explain to me your way for this conclusion.
Regards
Antoine