|
This is, however, the average reader of Entertainment Weekly, not Philosophical Quarterly
You gotta love this: "The Rings books were too expansive for me to get into but the movies are a work of art."
BTW, Aiwendil, that's not much a refutation, since the poster apparently detects no difference in style between Hobbit and LR! (and calls it a 'prequel.' Gaaaah.....)
__________________
The entire plot of The Lord of the Rings could be said to turn on what Sauron didn’t know, and when he didn’t know it.
|