Quote:
|
Originally Posted by morm
So phantom was Feanor obligated to have Melkor taint him?
|
He didn't have a choice. If Melkor decides he is going to corrupt someone, if he's allowed to work his evil magic (the way the Valar allowed him to), then it's pretty much a given that he's going to succeed. Even Hurin the Steadfast couldn't help but be tainted by Melkor.
Once Melkor decided that ruining Feanor was his top priority, it was
going to happen. Melkor is
that powerful.
If his target of choice would've been Finrod during those years in Valinor, then Finrod would've done something nutty (unless the Valar had stepped in to counter Melkor).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by morm
Why is it the Valar's job to bail him out?
|
Why is it their job to be fair?
Why is it their job to try and undo Melkor's evil?
Why is it their job to have compassion on a child of Eru and attempt to set them right?
You've gotta be kidding.
If you want to see how Feanor should've been dealt with, look at Melian and Hurin. She did the right thing and showed compassion and undid Melkor's malice. The Valar on the other hand strengthened Melkor's lies with their harsh banishment. They dropped the ball, plain and simple.
Anyway, this is exactly why I didn't want Feanor included in this thing. Hardly anyone thinks about him properly.