Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
I agree here...Isildur is probably one of the weakest parts of the show. It has nothing to do with the actor, but both Isildur and Theo's characters I just don't care about and are the most boring (which made Episode 3 the weakest). Terrible choice to try to "trick" the audience with Isildur's death in Season 1  . And somehow, he turns up captured in a spider web. |
Isildur should certainly be one of their strongest characters and at the forefront of the plot, rather than the role he has been given as almost a second-thought (though, in fairness, perhaps they intend greater things in the later seasons- if they get that far).
I tried to like Theo and all that his plot entailed, but really it's quite unlikable. He's got too much rebellious, "emo/goth" child in his character, to the point of vague annoyance, rather than a real interest in his part in the plot.
And, absolutely, that "plot-twist" of having Isildur assumed dead was absurd. It's as though they are appealling to people who have never read the books, and thus might not realize that Isildur does, in fact, live. They simply tack on "The Lord of the Rings" to the title in hopes of luring in the masses of casual movie-watchers who enjoy Peter Jackson's films, while in reality their creation is nothing like the movies,
much less Tolkien's writings.
And, after all's said and done, they've created a show that most lore-purists hate, for obvious reasons, and a show that many casual seekers of entertainment lack interest in for continuity errors, a stretched plot, dreadful writing, and cheap copying of the films.
Not to mention the countless bits of lore in the form of "name-dropping" that can only be understood and appreciated by those who
have read the books, which make the non-reader audience feel as though they are in a room with people discussing things using big words that they don't understand.