I was successfully keeping my hands clean until now. But -
Quote:
Originally Posted by monks
Those two items: the loathly prediction and the whip update, would at the absolute minimum raise an eyebrow from any rational person. But they didn't. (Indeed the update was described by one lunatic as clickbait.) That is NOT a normal, rational response Huinersoron.
|
monks, are you saying that you're surprised that
no one else raised an eyebrow? Let me just follow your logic here.
Premise: A rational person would agree with your claim.
Observation: No one so far agrees with your claim.
Conclusion: All of them are just irrational idiots who refuse to see the truth!
Talking about plausibility, what do you think is more plausible:
every single person around you is an idiot, or your premise is incorrect and your claim is in fact NOT something rational people would agree with?
People aren't saying that what you say is completely and absolutely wrong. But it also isn't completely and absolutely
right. It's shaky speculation - perhaps entertaining to indulge in, but not something a
rational person is willing to accept as absolute truth. I am baffled at how
you can accept your conjecture as absolute truth, given that you're not exactly dealing with exact science here.