Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zil
Well, considering they only knew what we did, that was one nice hit by the QT. Can we have a repeat?
|
Indeed! I was disbelievingly jubilant after the deadline, and my first thought was "is there a possibility
Huine has actually spilled the names of his fellows in the dead thread by accident"
(While sadly probably not, it
is true that he can talk about his live fellows in an incriminating way and that way the qt innocents have access to evidence we don't. Something to consider... (Not that I'm saying we should always follow the qt vote, even though that would make this game easier.
)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zil
Quick take on the votes is that there are three categories: 1. Lhuna-voters; 2. Other bandwagons; and 3. Me, voting for Lommy alone
|
Awww, don't forget
Greenie voting for you alone.
I'm really baffled about the
Lalaith kill. It's not what I expected at all. Uhh better her than the seer? I will take a look at her posts right now.
Btw, speaking of seer post analysis, does anyone remember a little exchange between me and
Lhuna from yesterDay? I had analysed
Legate's posts, and concluded that if the wolves had thought him the seer, then
Rune looks innocent because
Legate consistently called him innocent from Day1.
Lhuna did her best to discredit this argument, saying the wolves wouldn't assume the seer to be so obvious. Now I can't think of a single reason why wolf-
Lhuna would try to discredit a very sensible theory that points at packmate-
Rune's innocence. Therefore, I'm even more convinced that
Rune is innocent.
edit: xed with the last three posts