Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac
I'm biased here, obviously, but I really don't think my post had the merit of "the single most suspicious thing". Also, "the single most suspicious thing" clashes quite a bit with "maybe flimsy". If what I did was so suspicious, then why call the suspicion flimsy in the same sentence??
|
You’re forgetting it was Day 1. I don’t know about you, but at least for me, it’s entirely possible for a lead to be relatively flimsy but still the single most suspicious thing you see during Day 1.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac
Incorrect. This is by the time I got to make that list. I turned on him right after he made his post linking me and Inzil. He made several posts, acknowledging my suspicion in one, between that and his vote.
|
If I understand you right, and remember right, I think this is down to me not writing clearly – the “he” in that quote referred to you, not
Huin. As in, your suspicion of
Huin came after you had already voted for
Lommy so you couldn’t act on it whether you’d have wanted to or not. (Please poke me again if that’s wrong too though!)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Legate
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Macalaure
Greenie's main suspects in her list (outside of Brinn and me) are Sally and Inzil, who are pretty much universally suspected by everyone, it seems, so that's a fairly safe thing to do.
The rest of her posts toDay all seem fair and helpful, though the explanation of her vote to Legate seems a bit wolfish. Wolves pre-think how their votes can be made to sound all reasonable before the Day starts, and I get a bit of that vibe there.
|
That's what I thought too. Lots of Greenie's posts have been "safe" that way. |
What can I say?
Sally and
Inzil both cast votes that look like they could have been motivated by trying to save
Huin, both bring this up themselves in a fairly shifty way, and neither of their interactions with
Huin contradicts a read of them as fellow wolves.
Sally didn’t interact with Huin at all and has played generally safe and uncontroversial, while
Inzil brought up an obvious Ranger slip, and was suspected by
Huin on both days in a way that would just pass for safe wolf-on-wolf. I’d say both have fairly strong cases against them, so I’m not surprised if they are “pretty much universally suspected”.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lottie
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Thinlómien
Lottie, you're talking about Greenie and quoting my suspicion list. No wonder it's inconsistent.
|
Whoooops! I could have sworn I saw a list from Greenie, but then, I haven't had coffee yet this morning... I'm going to add a note to my previous post mentioning that it was actually Lommy's list so I don't try to quote myself later and get mixed up. |
The best part about this was, I sat there reading and rereading that quote trying to figure out when I wrote it. Like, I didn't immediately realise I hadn't. Should I be worried?