Quote:
Originally Posted by Eomer of the Rohirrim
The Legate-as-Seer theory, based on his Day 2 list, needs to be checked against his Day 1 list.
Green was the sole serious suspect both days.
Nerwen, Lommy and Mith were alone as innocents on Day 2, but were all in the innocent pile on Day 1 as well - along with a bunch of other people. So if Legate is the Seer, did he dream Green on the first night? Why then would he spend both his dreams on people he found innocent? Very unlikely. On the other hand, he might have just got very lucky (or is very good at hunting!) in focusing on Green on Day 1 and confirming his correct suspicion the next night. This is more likely but still a bit of a long shot.
Rikae's focus on Loslote on Day 2 seems more Seerish. She puts great effort into making a case against her (#338) while couching in the post prior that she wanted to take a closer look at Loslote and Firefoot. Interestingly, in that post (#325) she mentions exactly three names as innocents: Agan, Mac and Morm.
|
This is the post in question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rikae
Just popping in to say I'm not particularly happy with the options at the moment. I don't have much time but how do others feel about Firefoot, and about Lottie? These loud, controversial people - Agan, Mac - seem less and less wolfish to me, and I don't see much of a case against Morm.
|
The comment about
Morm does sound rather like classic seer-phrasing, but I'm not so sure about the rest. Though,
Rikae was very strongly against lynching
Agan on Day One, to the extent of voting
Lommy for "fabricating" a case against her- that could mean something.