Quote:
Originally Posted by Nilpaurion Felagund
So mistress Rikae has already addressed the exact same points I have in post 90, just in a more succinct and understandable manner.
I should be going back to sleep, I guess.
|
I prefer gender neutral terms... but thanks for the "succinct and understandable" bit.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nilp
I am suspicious of Mac's pooh-poohing (is that a word? It is now!) phantom's plan of transferring information from the Dead to the Living without suggesting an alternative or even a modification to the original.
|
I am somewhat suspicious of it, too. And of
Lommy's.
As long as there are at least three players in each wagon, there will always be a way for the dead to opt out of
phantom's plan: simply give the extra vote to someone who isn't on the list.
For instance, let's say
Nilp,
Nog and I voted for
Mac, while
Mith,
Agan and
phantom voted for
Lommy.
We tell the dead "give
phantom or
Rikae the extra vote if
Legate was guilty, give
Nilp or
Mith the extra vote if
Legate was innocent" (and yes, I think we can coordinate enough to make such a message clear. Anyone muddying the waters will only look wolfish)
If the dead know nothing about
Legate, they can simply choose between
Nog and
Agan for the extra vote, depending on what they think of
Mac and
Lommy. Seems pretty flexible.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Agan
If somebody would like to explain the actual benefits of lynching somebody today, I'm more than willing to reconsider, but as I see it, we're trying to apply old rules to a new concept.
|
Because, firstly, we have a chance to lynch a wolf: a chance that, historically, is nearly as good (or might even be as good, given the confidence interval) as on Day 2.
Besides, if people are relying on learning much from the night kills toMorrow (not that I ever put that much faith in night-kill analysis anyway), that doesn't apply now. We won't know the roles.
Second, it forces people to leave trails.
Edit: x'd with everybody since Nog #132