Nerwen -
The "Jonathan" quote was apparently from a game where she was a wolf -
would a wolf make such a risky joke? I think a Nerwolf would.
A
wishy-washy post about Inzil-Mac-Mc. "Might be possible fellows" but "it seems like cub-tactics".
Immediately on Day 2, exclaims "What the heck is going on in this village?

", and then
explains.
This looks very innocent: a little too innocent. It also is a good way of framing the discussion (if she's a wolf, she may be giving the real reason, and then immediately offering an alternative in order to keep Inzil as a possible suspect).
Analyzes Aganzir at length. In retrospect, lots of text but not much light shed on anything: same conclusions as her previous post and also mentions that
Agan could have looked like the wildcard.
Calls
Zil "really weird today".
Analyzes Legate. Concludes that
Greenie is suspicious.
Doesn't really want to vote for
Inzil.
Mac and
Greenie's reactions to the night kill were suspicious.
An Inzil-lynch was possible, and I could see why a wolf-Nerwen wouldn't want to be in the wagon. Funny, she's the one who started talk about a bluff, too.
Votes for
Mac. Can't really conclude anything from that, it was truly pointless.
Day 3 - analyzes
McCaber. Concludes
Inzil is an ordo, and also possibly
Greenie,
Sally,
Wilwa.
Sally -
"Who do I have to kill this time?

"
Looks like any way you slice it, we have a wolf making a wolfy comment in her first post (if I'm right about Greenie and Inzil).
Lots and lots and lots of banter. That's
Sally, though.
Day 1 vote for
Inzil:
"This might sound silly, but I think he's being louder than he would be as an ordo. His behavior regarding
the McPlayers is also a bit unsettling, as has been pointed out, but I am more caught by his volume at this point; I feel an ordo
Dun would have been less involved in toDay's discussions (if you can call them discussions). Alas, that's the best hunch I have."
This seems reasonable enough.
"Regarding the possibility of Agan bluffing as seer"
Wait, what? Sally, were you saying Agan was pretending to be a seer who was pretending not to have dreamt of an Inzil-wolf?
Because if so, that's the most bizarre werewolf-theory I've ever heard, and I've heard some weird stuff.
Suspicious of
Wilwa for mentioning she'd be back on Day 3, sees it as a possible hint to her pack.
Kind of far-fetched. Wolf-on-wolf?
Argues that
Inzil could be
Wilwa's packmate because he's complaining about lack of participation? That's even more far-fetched. Votes him, though, for his "comments and shifting attitudes toDay".
I don't know how I feel about this. Obviously, I found him suspicious myself yesterDay, but this connection she's trying to make between him and Wilwa is really out there.
Shasta -
Weird comment about
Greenie's comment about me.
At first I thought he suspected her, but apparently he meant to cast suspicion on me. This "Nah, it's probably nothing.
" business is a little creepy. I kind of have the feeling he's trying to use his reputation as an excuse to raise suspicions without committing himself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastanis Althreduin
There's something strange going on between Mac and Inzil, seemingly. If Agan was killed due to looking like the Seer (I can't find another reason for her to be killed so soon after causing Legate's death, anyway) then I tend to lean towards Mac. Plus he voted me yesterday, the cad!
++Macalaure
|
Uh... nope, I don't understand the reasoning behind this vote at all. Can you explain, Shasta?
Wilwa -
Day 1, absent.
Day 2 -
says the
Agan kill makes
Inzil look innocent and she doesn't think a bluff is likely, but then says it could have been random and she won't decide
Inzil's innocence based on it.
Semi-fishy.
Votes for
Greenie by
process of elimination. There is no real explanation for anything in this post, as far as I can see.
So for these four
, Nerwen and
Shasta seem the most wolfish, but I really can't say
Wilwa and
Sally seem squeaky clean either. I can't be 100% sure about
Greenie, but the chance she was a seer dream means I won't risk voting for her toDay.
Inzil I'll assume is innocent.