Unless another and more promising scenario turns out I'm probably ready to suggest we lynch
Kitanna toDay. That is both because I think she might be our best shot, but also to avoid the situation where we need to mull over the same question toMorrow.
What comes to possible lion-on-lion votes there are I think reasons which speak both for and against it in this particular game.
Now the fact that the seer is gone would surely add the temptation of lion-on-lions as without a
deus ex machina all we can now rely on is trust.
Then again the game is big and with the bear around doing some killing as well I'd think it a bit reckless & foolish of the lions to willingly give up one of their own numbers. Which, now as I think about it, sounds like a more substantial point than the above about there not being seer anymore.
All that doesn't mean the lions would not suspect other lions when it is relatively safe (or even vote if it is "relatively safe"), but in this situation I wouldn't think voting to kill one of their own would be a good move on their behalf.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eomer
But trying to be as objective as possible (and I won't be pushing this point after this post, don't worry) I agree with you that no villain would have gotten so mixed up as I did. That's as strong an argument for my innocence as I think you're likely to get in a WW game.
|
I kind of like this reaction to our musings that I'm probably thinking
Eomer more innocent than not - at least for the time being...
EDIT: X'd with Wyth & Zil