Day One
Lottie
#8. Banter. (In which you can perhaps read either Seer– or wolf- hints if you really want to, but I think it’s just banter.)
#32.
Feels “pretty good” about
Coppermirror. Is “a bit shaky" on
Greenie but “leaning innocent”.
Legate and
Greenie’s squabble seems innocent-on-innocent, though also possible from two “very bold” wolves. On the whole thinks them both innocent, but “with a question mark”.
Lommy seems “a little less innocent, but nothing that shoves her into ‘terrifying sorcerer’ territory yet’. Has no read on
Zil, Kath or
me, and thus will be focussing on us. Mentions being busy that Day.
Comment: Although
Lottie describes this post as “getting down to business”, she effectively says nothing much about any player apart from
Cop, leaving it open to herself to suspect, or not suspect, anyone else at short notice. Well– it was very early in the Day, after all, and only her second post.
#71. [Replying to
Kath at #54– the quote refer to
Lottie’s comments on
Legate and
Greenie]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kath
Lottie:
Refusal to make a statement alert!
|
Oh, honey, I never commit to solid statements! I'm a philosophy major.
Seriously, though, this post just made me rather uneasy about her. A lot of the reasoning seems forced, almost like she's trying to suspect people even though she knows they can't be sorcerers. It could just be Day-1 lack of proper suspicions and trying to get traction, but it doesn't sit well with me.
|
#88.
Replying to Coppermirror at
#86.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lottie
I think your reaction here is wonderfully innocent, and I'm pretty okay with your first Controversial Post. At this point, I'm fairly certain you won't kill me in my sleep.
Legate's reaction to the Cop Controversy is also interesting - he doesn't jump on it as further reasoning to vote you, which could speak well for his non-sorcererarity, but he's experienced and might be wary of jumping on a bandwagon - though if that's the case, he wound up voting for you anyway, so I'm leaning innocentish on him.
|
This is where it gets interesting. Twice now we have had
Lottie mention
Cop in highly positive terms, while remaining non-commital about everyone else. A foolish move from a Seer who had in fact dreamed no-one yet– she should have realised how that would be taken if she died before revealing.
#89. Vote-post.
Quote:
So we have a triple tie between Cop, Kath, and Legate, with no clarifying rules on tie-breakers? Well then.
++Kath
I find her far more suspicious than either Cop or Legate.
|
A somewhat fishy vote– somebody mentioned later that
Lottie here seems relieved to have her choices narrowed down, and I tend to agree with that.
EDIT: And Lottie’s final post of the day was “That clears that right up”, with an eyeroll emoticon, in response to
Holby’s re-creating the tie with her vote on
Legate.
Shasta
#46. “Hi, I’m here” post. Also mentions being busy.
#84.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasta
Argh. Something's come up and I'm not going to be able to spend the time I'd like reading what's happened today.
Moddess Sally, I abstain from voting today.
|
And that’s it from
Shasta for Day One.
Conclusions: Ugh.
Shasta is an enigma and
Lottie is a conundrum. In the context of Day One only, her comments about
Cop look distinctly Seer-ish– however,
Lottie herself has said she *didn’t* dream
Cop, or indeed anyone. Wolf laying ground for a false reveal, then? But in that case, why didn’t she stick with
Cop as her first dream?
Perhaps later Days will provide answers.