No surprises here–
my treasure’s “Well, that’s torn it. Very nicely done,” remark (#280) pretty much had to come from either a wolf preparing for a fake reveal– or the Seer– and I’m inclined to think he’s the latter.
Why would a false Seer name someone as (apparently) generally trusted as
Steve? Why not pick someone whom people might accept more readily as a wolf? He could really only *count* on my support– and the rest of you don’t much trust me anyway.
Well, I can think of one reason– the wolves might have been convinced
Steve was the Seer, about to out one of their number, have failed to kill him last Night due to Ranger-protection, and thought this was the best option left them. Okay. That’s what we’ll have to look at if
Steve turns out innocent, or something else turns up, or whatever.
In the meantime, I think
Eonwe should go on toDay’s lynch-list.
–Oh yes, I’ve seen your numbers-based arguments,
Steve, but the problem, from the village’s point-of-view, is that they would apply in the case of any alleged wolf revealed by any alleged Seer.
By the way:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steve
So, whatever the case, if the real Seer has found the other sorcerer, it's probably best to step out now (anyway, even if this is all an elaborate lie, just replace Shasta's name with mine. It's the same principle).
|
Maybe I’m being dense here, but what the heck does this mean?
EDIT:X’d with
Steve, and
Lottie’s competing reveal. Well, well!