View Single Post
Old 08-27-2013, 03:16 PM   #255
A Little Green
Leaf-clad Lady
 
A Little Green's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,571
A Little Green is wading through snowdrifts on Redhorn.A Little Green is wading through snowdrifts on Redhorn.A Little Green is wading through snowdrifts on Redhorn.A Little Green is wading through snowdrifts on Redhorn.
Send a message via MSN to A Little Green
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boro
I would think if Cop was a sorcerer trying to pull off all the stops to hold off being lynched she would be making a false seer claim. Therefor the "I'm either the protector/hunter wizard" I'm going to take as genuine.
I'm not sure about this - the hunter/ranger-reveal is far less risky because a) it's practically impossible to disprove and b) it doesn't require saying anything else. Meaning that if you fake reveal as a seer, you need to be able to elaborate on your dreams and preferably point to hints in your previous posts or something. You practically can't blunder a ranger/hunter-reveal, but a seer-reveal you can.

That said, I won't be voting Cop toDay. I think it's best we wait and see what happens during the Night. So that leaves
Kath and McCaber who I'm definitely not voting,
Lommy and Shasta who keep giving me good vibes, though I might have to look at them more closely later,
Lottie who also looks quite good to me, though to a slightly lesser degree than the two previous ones,
Nerwen and Eonwe whose squabble made both look worse, and
Boro who I feel slightly concerned about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasta
The vote is fair enough here. What I'm not sure I approve of is how apologetic Nerwen seems to be about it, both bringing up an instance of how she could be wrong and apologizing for the vote itself. I don't feel like this is typical Nerwen behavior.
This is an interesting point, especially combined with her yesterDay's vote post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
I really just can’t make up my mind whether the “evil” reading of her posts is the right one, but I think it’s a possible one, anyway.
Which also comes across as somewhat apologetic. As if she was apologizing in advance in case we happened to lynch the person she voted for and they turned out to be innocent. Concerns me a little. But then again there's Eonwe too, who I'm getting quite wary of. He leaps rather easily from disagreeing with Nerwen to suspecting her and then as she responds to that he does an almost-Legate-180 and says Nerwen might not be suspicious after all. What?

What confuses me even more is that I doubt their exchange was wolf-on-wolf - it would have been extremely bold to draw so much attention to themselves, especially as neither had really been in the spotlight yesterDay. Seems like a pointless risk to take. It is also possible that it was innocent-on-innocent and I'm wasting my time here, but they both look fishy and I have no better leads at the moment.

There would also be Boro who I'm getting more concerned about, but I don't have time for a proper look at him now so I'll probably have to leave him be for toDay.


EDIT: x-ed with Lottie and two Lommies!
__________________
"But some stories, small, simple ones about setting out on adventures or people doing wonders, tales of miracles and monsters, have outlasted all the people who told them, and some of them have outlasted the lands in which they were created."
A Little Green is offline   Reply With Quote