Crossed with several, but I forgot to respond to
Cop here:
Quote:
|
Boro, I'd like some more info about your Day 1 vote. I can see why you didn't like my vote for you earlier, but I'd like to know why you chose to vote for me over the other candidates. Specifically, Pom.
|
Day 1 I wasn't suspicious of
Pom, I was suspicious of you,
Brinn, and
Nog. Seeing as you had some votes, the others didn't, and despite
McCaber and
Pom looking opportunistic to latch on and vote for you I wanted to vote for the person I was suspicious of...you.
It may make me a hypocrite to cite that others looked like they were trying to steer focus away from
Pom, while I was arguably doing the same (by voting you). But there is a big difference between making a note that
McCaber and
Pom both looked opportunistic in their day 1 votes. And doing what
Greenie did, which was say that both looked opportunistic, but somehow
McCaber's was more suspicious than
Pom's...thus putting the focus on
McCaber's jumpy vote and not
Pom's.