Quote:
Originally Posted by Loslote
(Underlining mine) Sorry, what? Since when do we know Cab is innocent? The only reason I can think of for you to assume Cab is innocent is if you *know* he is - because he isn't one of your packmates.
Quick disclaimer: I hit the quote button on the selection above before I saw the quote below.
...well, that escalated quickly. So...you're suspecting me for voting second. For a wizard. When I knew at the time there were at least three others ( Sally, Nog, and Bane) who also suspected said wizard. Were I a wizard, that would be a stupidly risky move for me to pull on a Day 1. Moreover, assuming I did not want my packmate to actually get lynched, what benefit would I have for voting for my packmate as opposed to one of the other *three* possible bandwagons?
All in all, I don't want to knee-jerk all over this thread, but  |
ah but see the reason is all in the timing.
A wizard, I doubt, would be the first to vote for a packmate.
The third would be highly risky as that was the tying vote
The fourth vote was the clincher so it would be odd for a wizard to so readily shove
pom across the line.
So if there's a wizard there it's the second vote, you. That's the thinking anyway.
As for innocent
Cab I'd think it's pretty clear my interretation was in the form of hypothetical. A theory I ran with with many of the voters for example if
nog is guilty
cab is innocent.
x
ed with
Zil