Quote:
Originally Posted by Glorthelion
I know I'm certainly saying some Tolkien blasphemy, but I think it is an interesting idea to have the hobbit divided into 3 parts, instead of just one whole movie. Some source said they would include some material from the appendices. I consider that interesting. Taking a look the last book of some teenage fiction books are being divided into 2 parts like HG, HP, and Twilight. I know I'm the black sheep here but it's just my opinion.
|
No "blasphemy". You've got your own view, that's all.
The article I referenced makes a connection between PJ's decision and the recent trend in cinema to divide adaptations of single books into multiple movies.
My question for PJ is this: would three movies be necessary if he didn't put in bits that
aren't in the book? (*cough*, Tauriel)