Quote:
Originally Posted by dreeness
("Vicious"? Do you know that Zaentz tried to financially destroy John Fogerty?)
|
I see no association with the topic of this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreeness
(On an internet posting board?! The horror, the horror...)
|
It isn't the mere use of emoticons that is the problem. The context in which you use them is inconsistent with the words around them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreeness
(That's rich.)
|
I would posit you're the only one here who thinks so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreeness
(Way to evoke some serious menace, dude. Were you brandishing a plastic lightsaber when you typed that?)
|
Again with the discourtesy. I don't know what other forums you've lurked at, but here civil discourse and respect for others is highly valued.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreeness
(Yay, ethnic stereotypes!)
|
She said "welch". Not quite the same as "welsh", and in any case, a common expression.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreeness
(Well yeah, but thats "survival vs utter ruin", not "tons of money vs tons more money"
|
So you think the Estate is not entitled to proceeds from the movies, then? Do you have a reason, besides saying "CT was against the movies, so he shouldn't accept any of the profits from them?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreeness
(Well, apparently that makes you a Thought Criminal.)
|
Once again, it isn't your opinion that is bothersome, it is the manner in which you express it.