Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
"Crawl! Crawl for your lives!"
|
I LOL'ed!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nerwen
Btw, that article you linked to, Mr Underhill, is really quite interesting... once you get past the bizarre presentation, anyway.
|
Yes, Film Crit Hulk takes some getting used to, but I think he has some really great insights and ideas about film if you can just go with the flow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by littlemanpoet
Thanks for the reference to cause & effect in Spielberg, Mister Underhill. What does that say about Peter Jackson?
|
Well, it's a continuum, right? I think Jackson often loses sight of the big picture for the sake of a gag in the moment, whether it's a JUMP! of surprise, a burp joke, a bit of shield-surfing, a gross-out image, what have you. His focus is more on the moment-to-moment without always being in control (or sometimes, being aware) of how a given choice might be undermining what he's trying to accomplish overall. And he obviously isn't always able to manage the clarity of intention of a Spielberg (though not many do).
Quote:
Originally Posted by littlemanpoet
YOU DO NOT BREAK THE RULE OF NO VIOLENCE DURING PARLEY. IT'S A MAJOR COMPROMISE OF ONE'S HONOR. Why doesn't Peter Jackson know that?
|
I think again it goes back to Jackson favoring going for something extreme in the moment over a careful control of what he's building in the overarching narrative. A digitally enlarged mouth is a more arresting visual. A beheading is more shocking and visually interesting than both sides just riding away, even though it happens to subvert the personality of one of your most important characters.