Quote:
Originally Posted by Eönwë
I don't really feel comfortable voting for someone (unless we go for someone who hasn't spoken yet, as Inzil suggested, but that seems unfair considering how little those who are here have said), since there's not really enough to go on to make any proper suspicion. On the other hand, the alternative means that we're giving the wolves- erm, Committee members- a free Hour, but on the other hand (Yes, a third hand, I know), there's a large chance of killing an innocent, which would be worse.
|
It does seem a bit unsporting to get someone who hasn't posted. I just don't really know who else to vote for though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
The thing about Greenie I dislike / suspect is that she goes on explaining why a wolf wouldn't have done what wilwa did (dare to talk about how a seer might try to play) and that that is the reason she feels good about her.
Really, a wolf would exactly "dare" to do that. A wolf would love to point that out if none else had done it as the seer surely has thought of that. And I remember Greenie most often being on the camp which says "you elitists don't you think the gifteds can't think themselves!" when someone dares to suggest something to the gifteds - but now she thinks the seer might not have thought of the obvious?
So that I find a bit dubious.
|
x/d with
Mac and
Nog
I guess I see what you're saying. It's a bit thin, but that's hardly surprising this time.
I see
Mac has elaborated on his
Wilwa bad vibe, which he readily admits is pretty thin.
Crud.