Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pitchie
I don't think so. The benefit of a logical hunter is not only that no innocents get killed if the hunter dies, but also that if the hunter dies alone and we can figure out who she hunted, we have a known innocent. That in mind, I'd actually expect a hunter of Rikae's format to leave a cleverly disguised hint about her target that we can figure out with hindsight.
|
If you really think that, can you then tell us our "known innocent"?
I mean yes, I can say
Boro could be innocent, or then
Zil could be innocent, or maybe
Steve because she said she will "keep an eye on him", or... Which one that ingenius hint gives us to figure out?
Really. A bold hunter might try to lure the wolves to her (and there's no question
Rikae couldn't be that), but would she then tell them, or even hint at, whom she is really hunting?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pitch
Try to make up your mind whether I'm being "wise with hindsight", as you said earlier, or had wolvish knowledge in advance, will you?
|
I'd tell everyone if I only knew... But I'm trying, trust me, I'm trying...