Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eönwë
I didn't like the acolyte discussion because it meant everyone could hide under the veil of "This discussion is better than nothing, at least later we can look back on it" (see my earlier post). I'm still not sure what Inzil was getting at, but by reiterating his side so many times, he gave more justification for people to argue the side that already has general consensus, and so no, I didn't like that because it gives the wolves a place to hide. |
That's as may be, but
Zil's reiterating was prompted by repeated questions from
Legate, so it seems unfair to blame him alone for the change in the discussion.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Eönwë
Just because something doesn't automatically make him evil, it doesn't mean I have to like what he's doing, does it?
|
No, it doesn't, but poking someone again and again over a point so you can then complain that he's "reiterating his side" and starting a pointless discussion doesn't look particularly innocent either. OK,
Legate did the poking and you the complaining, but you're using the controversy between them to paint
Zil as suspicious by blaming the whole controversy on him, while it took two to keep it going. If you think this is misrepresenting you, so be it, but it's the best I have toDay.
Therefore,
++Eönwë
In other news, I'm not happy with
Bom's Nilp-vote, quite happy with
Lottie's rant defending herself against
Nog, a little puzzled by this sudden
Lommywagon, and too pressed for time to make up my mind about the rest. Á vala Melkor!
(EDIT: x-ed with the whole Bomwagon)