[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by narfforc
I recently watched The Eagle, a film which had virtually no female roles in it whatsoever. This did not spoil the film for me at all, for there was no reason for any female lead role in it.
|
Agreed. I'd rather see a film with no female characters than with female characters that are cliched or unrealistic.
Quote:
|
I do not think that beefing up a female serves any purpose, yes they can fight, there are many female boxers, martial artists and servicewomen who are tough, however they are not tougher than the men.
|
There's nothing wrong with a female fighter. Just because they are not
as strong as men does not mean they are not strong
period (in the same way that not having an IQ of 300 doesn't mean that you're stupid) – BUT I see something wrong with 'beefing up' a female character just to show that she can fight, and not because she's serving any purpose. Usually, when women in movies are fighters, they are the ONLY woman present, and actually just serve to be eye-candy for the men seated in the audience. In the end, they always need to be rescued. Bottom line? Either give me a female fighter with emotional flaws that doesn't need to be saved every two minutes, or don't give me a female fighter at all.
Quote:
|
where things level out is in the grey matter
|
Men - physically superior due to strength
Women - biologically superior due to creation of life
Fact of nature. No point arguing.