Quote:
Originally Posted by The Elf-warrior
Actually, Legate, I had and still have time. I was trying to prod you with my remark and your responses seem unwolvish to me. In response to your question, it's easier to make comments about people who haven't said much.
|
Fair enough. But now, since you say you have time, couldn't you also use it to say something about those who have said more?
I could basically now vote just as well for
Zil - I am not sure, his last post made me somehow unsure about him. In fact,
Nerwen with the last one could be also just as well trying to cast suspicion at
Pitch, for example, if I were to go for that. I could still vote basically anybody of those, it is all about equally strong suspicion (that means, nothing much in general, but I have to choose somebody).
But I think I could vote
Elf-warrior in the end - maybe also it could be used as a "warning vote", if nothing else, to underline my point: if you say that it is easier to make comments about people who haven't said much, yes, maybe, but that actually sounds like ignoring them (if you don't post anything about them, at least a sentence, or a yes/no note!). It is not such a big deal to make comments about people who have said a lot, it is more a problem to
read their posts, isn't it? And I certainly hope you are trying to at least
read everyone's posts, at least briefly.
Therefore,
++Elf-warrior