Quote:
Originally Posted by the phantom
I like that Mith spotted Inzil's word choice, as I noticed it too. Sorry lad.  |
Don't be sorry! I'm not immune to suspicion, no matter how nit-picky.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
Call me biased, because it's about me, but I just don't like the look of that suspicion, without it really trying to look like a suspicion. I know Inzil's argument about wolf-on-wolf votes is a normal assumption to make, and I believe Inzil said at the beginning of the day he want to find something in the Bom votes.
|
SO what I said would have been all right, if it hadn't been you I was talking about?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
Granted I didn't indicate I cross-posted, but I rarely ever take the time to edit in a "x-post" unless it's a massively long one. All one has to do is look at the time stamps and see my vote crossed with Inzil's and wilwa's therefor mine coming last in that group of 3 is inconsequential. Inzil pointing out my vote of all of them, being the "last one" and thus "least shiny" looks like a cheap boot-strapping suspicion attempt. (ergo, makes me suspicious of him).
|
Maybe I'm biased, but this seems like an overdone defense for such a relatively small observation about your vote.