Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Do you read everything or do you just pick some posts to read G55? If you do read everything I'd like to hear what do you think is suspicious in my post explaining my votes a few posts ago? Just make your case and do not just follow those who voted/ suspected before they were answered.
|
I've read everything, don't worry.
My reaction to yor vote-explaining post was "of
course he would say that."
You want more evidence?
I said some things in my
analysis, although that is kind of outdated. In my
conclusion I said that your posts give me good vibes, but now that is changed.
Your
Lottie-vote didn't change anything at all. If you are her packmate, your vote would make you look innocent. As I said before, you only started pressing her and "noticing" queer things about her after
Shasta got the stone rolling towards her. You answered some things
here, but the
Lottie-vote-excuse is still shoddy.
Then your vote for
Mith - came, as I said, almost out of nowhere. I'm not speaking about
Mith now and whatever faulty and questionable things she's said; I'm just analysing your vote. You've voiced suspicion for her twice just before voting, but never before. Were there just way too many people having
Kit on their suspect list for you to care about her being lynched? And you would look better for your eleventh jour change of heart.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
I'm getting uneasy with this, even if there are reasons staring right at my eyes there. This Kit-wagon looks like too opportunistic even if popular wagons hjave caught baddies too. But now something feels really odd in here.
|
As soon as there are people voting
Kit, you're out of it, though she has been one of your top suspects.
Your first post toDay (340):
Quote:
|
Way to go Lommy! I suspected Mith already yesterDay mainly because of the way she could be seen trying to help Lottie (while no one else did - and there are still two of her mates around!) and I have also felt a bit uneasy with some of her wolf's POV speculations, not that that couldn't or shouldn't be done, but they have been kind of "detailed" one wouldn't expect from an ordo.
|
In other words, "thank you
Lommy for giving me another good reason to back up my vote".
And there's your change of heart about me after I voiced my suspicion. I recall you thought me an innocent. Now you suspect both me and
Greenie (though she has been on your ist longer than I). Why? For not liking the way you post?
Moreover, your post that I quoted above is just too passionate. However feeble this reason is, it's weighing the scale down.
And speaking of
Mith: she has posted very little of content toDay, but a lot of high emotions. Makes me wonder. But I think her reasoning is very valid.
This took me waaaaay too long. I'm late!!
++Nog
I'm eating socks and hats tomorrow if he's innocent. Deal?
Edit: xed since the post I quoted