Greenie explaining her out of the blue vote for
Eomer yesterDay:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greenie
I needed to go to sleep and had no idea who I'd vote, so I chose to go without explanation for someone I was vaguely uneasy about - fishing for reactions while if he was in fact lynched we would not be lynching anyone I believed innocent.
|
Now this I think looks fishy, if you can say claiming to be fishing looks fishy without making a sort of tautology.
If
Nilp was a wolf, then threatening to pull out would be a bit too dramatic and thus I don't suspect him that much at the moment. We like to play with you
Nilp, so just bring yourself back! But we might also suspect you from time to time if there was a reason - and I think the basic reason some (including me) suspected you was your very confident backing of all us
Lottie-lynchers - like you tried to buddy-up with us in a way more fitting to wolves than innocents who don't exactly "know" things. I do agree on principle that I'd find it more improbable than not that a wolf would have joined the hanging of
Lottiewolf on D1 in this situation, but I wouldn't give a free-pass to
Lommy and
Legate because of that (and I don't presuppose you would give it to me either).
Why I find
Lommy &
Legate more or less innocent is that I think they speak sense and make good points - and them lynching a wolf is kind of adding up to that general feeling. It's not evidence, but one piece - even if a large one - in a pile.
I'm really torn with
Mith now. Her wolf-POV posts (not one but a few) look a bit too deep inside views or too closely thought to be innocent-made (or then I'm just seeing ghosts here); after
Lommy made X number of suspicions on her she only answered the one where
Lommy was maybe getting a bit over-eager to find evidence to support
Mith's guilt. That's something. But still I'm most bothered about
Mith's vote on D1.
There were three wolves on D1 and I just don't think they all let it go or actively sponsored her lynch. It just doesn't make sense as fex.
Sally (
Mith's vote btw.) was gathering quite a lot suspicion as well.The wolves can play sacrifying one of them but it's not what they normally do or which is clever for them on D1 on average. And the only one whom we could interpret as "trying to help"
Lottie was
Mith.
So either
Mith is a wolf or then no one cared about
Lottie dying.
Bom then... I'm leaning him to be too detached not being a wolf (and if he is and wins with this performance we can just nullify it as the win was not earned). I admit his vote yesterDay gave me the creeps and for a moment I was considering of voting him just because of that. But after some second thoughts I think it would be unwise to lynch him.
If he doesn't start appearing more often, I'd suggest to the mods of the next games not to allow him in though, unless he swears he will play too and not only hang around as totally unpredictable dead weight. (Sorry
Bom, you may have busy days and whatever - and if there is a
force majeure for you not playing then I do apologise, but if not, then I hope you understand that this is a game where we expect everyone to get involved).
Okay. A short pause now...
EDIT: X'd with Sally's last one. Hey, where is everybody?