Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ang
phantom, your first statement doesn't address my substance - that an accusation of Elrond's Daughter at this stage looks like a very easy course.
|
Yeah, well, concerning
Daughter I'm frankly I little ticked (mostly at myself) that I was prepared to vote for her yesterday and allowed myself to be led towards
Lottie. I can't help but think that had I focused my attentions on
Daughter things might've gone differently, but instead I dutifully contributed to the lynching of a Cobbler (which is their whole point of existence). Yes, I didn't vote for her, but I definitely was pushing the bus along.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ang
Your second is rather provocative. You're saying, according to your personal angle on things and sense of Mith's style, she's unlikely to have been Glorfindel? That, also, is my impression. But there's no need to give the impression that your supposition is a certainty
|
First question- answer is yes. But as far as certainty, I'm as certain as I can be without being specifically told, seeing as I narrowed the Glorfy/Hunter candidates down to three yesterday.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ang
Your third point is unworthy of you; you won't win my trust by throwing around blame in that childish tone. We ought to work together. If we are actually both innocent then this is intensely frustrating. But that's not the way to convince me
|
Yeah well sorry, I'm not that happy. You see, there's yet another reason I'm frustrated and I don't have the time to do anything about it now and even had I realized it earlier I wouldn't have had time to make much headway.
You see, with roles not being revealed after kills, for the past couple of days I completely and entirely spaced the idea of the Seer being night-killed! Given this game set-up I noted early on that there would be no need for a Seer to do much idea-planting until Lovers and Glorfy were dead, as they could simply send back dreams with them to the living. So, as we haven't lost Glorfy, the Seer could've easily been on sneaky mode, especially if he suffered some bad luck with dreams dying. So it's completely possible the Seer died without giving us much to go on (it could've been
Fea or
Mith for instance), or in fact they did give us info to go on but I didn't bother looking for it because the Mod never said "The Seer died", if you follow.
Basically I just feel like I'm entirely off kilter due primarily to the fact that I've had roughly half of my usual prep and reading time (compared to what I'm used to), and perhaps growing from that is this emerging sense of paranoia that hearkens back to WW II in which me and the other talkative gentleman enthusiastically killed each other to leave alive an entire pack of quieter ladies, and at this time that's the concept that has taken root in my mind.
That's why I've sort of gone off of
Boro a bit. I mean, his suspicion of
Lottie mirrored my own, and his willingness to attack me to start the day is a mirror of the urge I had yesterday, and it somehow seems too easy. I mean really, after yesterday suspecting
Boro and then perhaps you can say being led towards
Lottie incorrectly by him it would seem to be a very good guess that I'd come into today intending to lynch him.
And thus I will not. If I'm going to go down the wrong road it's
not going to be because of Wolfish tactics, leaving me alive because I've been wrong. Darn it, if I'm going to just completely lose this contest I'm going to do it my way! At least it won't be said that my reaction was predictable.
(x-post with everything since
Glirdan)