Quote:
Originally Posted by Glirdan
Depending on who was up for lynching, if the person that was lynched was a Wolf, the last person on the list for being lynched will get the vote, and if the person lynched is innocent, the first person on the lynching list will get the vote? Am I understanding that right? Or am I still all muddled up??  |
I've been confused about it too, but from how I read it.
Agan says in the Dead thread, the person who gets lynched will be the one they vote on and to check their role. (This makes sense to me, since
Manwe's been found to not be a wolf at least.
Shasta and
Fea clearly aren't wolves, and I don't think
Fea's a cobbler.
Agan will also be in the dead thread, so this puts solid control of the thread in innocent hands).
Now. In order to send information from the person we lynch they will double-vote based on the living-player list (not the lynch-list). If wolf, the person last on the living list will get the double vote. If not wolf, the person first on the living-list will get the double vote. In a sense then there is a delayed transfer of information. Since we won't discover whether the first, or last name on the living list got the double-vote until the next days lynch. But still it's a way to transfer info from the dead thread to the living about prior lynches without having to lose and rely on Glorfindel.
I can't think of a better idea right now. And at least for tomorrow, with the dead thread being firmly in innocent control I say go for it. I can see the risk once the living list gets low, and the dead thread possibly isn't controlled by the innocents. However, if that's the case then we're doing a good job as it is in lynching baddies.
I echo the others in let us know clearly how long and the plan,
Agan, so we don't botch and mis-read the transfer of info from the dead to the living.
Edit: crossed with everyone since
post
Edit 2:
Glirdan should be bolded there, but accidently wrapped his name in quotes. Oh well, I liked it.