DAY 1
Phantom assigned a role to everybody at the beginning of day 1 calling
Boro a cobbler.
Boro made a sports-related joke in return.
Nog pinged on his radar after like one or two posts because he was the first to start talking serious stuff. According to
Boro, he was trying to steer and spin what he wanted to spin and looked bleaker than the situation merited.
He was feeling good about
Lommy (who had called him a cobbler):
Quote:
|
--- Even if I think she had a nice working bororadar. It just needed updating, like a 2.0 version, or Bororadar Premium Edition.
|
He chastised
Glirdan and
Legate about exaggerating his early suspicion of
Nog, and voted for
Legate. This looks reasonable enough, unlike most other things he said or did on day 1.
DAY 2
He explains his
Legate vote a bit further, then says that in a game like this it's important to keep the voting close. This rings false to me. Firstly, it makes multiple lynches easier. Secondly, if someone appears much more suspicious than the others, the village usually wants her dead. This doesn't happen if we don't bandwagon. Thirdly, the votes don't have to be even in order for us to learn what the DL voters think.
He had
Greenie,
Nerwen,
sally, me (to be honest I'm quite upset about my threat level being considered that of a koala
) and
Fea listed as Koalas.
Nog and
Glirdan looked the worst to him, and he considered voting for one of them or
the phantom. He's convinced at least one of them is evil, probably more (
Glirdy at least a cobbler,
Nog looking desperate). He disapproved of
Greenie's plan to vote for
Nessa just because she might be an easy bandwagon target if people start having doubts about lynching one of the aforementioned three.
He then voted for
Nog, saying it's no good to insinuate players are cheating and he's confident about his vote.
After
Nog's revelation, he said there's no way to prove if he's telling the truth. He didn't make up his mind about him at all. He then discussed why
Nog said
the phantom was a cobbler - if he was a wolf, it would've made more sense to offer the name of a fellow if he wanted us to believe him, but saying someone is a cobbler isn't the best way to save oneself. When I first read this I thought it was
Boro's explanation for
believing Nog's claim (which I found extremely fishy) but now that it isn't 4 am anymore, I see it wasn't the case and it actually makes sense. Hmm okay then there's his next post where his opinion changes (after
phantom corrected him about the rules) so I don't know what he meant after all...
I think
Boro could go either way. Especially some of that
Lommy stuff and the thing about keeping the votes even. Suspecting
Noggins doesn't tell us much about
Boro because
Nog was probably a cobbler and therefore they wouldn't have known of each other even if both are baddies.
I have been writing this on and off and haven't really read anything after my last post. Will be back later.