Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Legate of Amon Lanc   Or what about all the quieter folk? Don't we have a team, after all, which is made only out of them? (Something like Greenie-Mänwe-LRH-Cailín/Nessa/BG or something... would actually make a lot of sense, especially in relation to the first Night awkward kills. | 
	
 Quieter folk are the easiest to tarnish with the same brush and leave the greater possibility for a judgement error on behalf of their would be jurors. Although I would concede the more quiet the less likely you are to say something that'll give you away. But this reminds me of something 
Rikae mentioned that irked me a little
	Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Rikae  ...but if we lynch a good quiet one, at least the remaining innocents will be the more helpful ones, alive or wolf-killed | 
	
 I don't see how some of the most talkative ones can be considered more helpful due to the possibility that every word they say is designed to mislead or indeed because they write so long a post people don't want to read it 
 
Quiet can't be so black or white, for in those names that 
Legate mentioned there are those who have made the odd post, and those that have popped in to vote; two very different quiet "strategies" if you will...
elronds_daughter  being case in point with two very wild votes.
Also, 
Legate
	Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Legate of Amon Lanc  Maybe if I scratch Greenie from that and make it one of the five, it would make the most sense, as there is a slight chance Greenie would not like to kill Ozban or Kath.) | 
	
 May I ask you to clarify this point about 
Greenie not wanting to vote 
Oz or 
Kath?
Maybe more questions ought to be asked of the two extremes, those who just pop into vote and those who do the most talking..