Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Because the wolves have all to gain from a revealment. Read back what we discussed the last two hours or so.
Revealments are a no-no because we don't know what's the result - with the case of the hunter we'll know the result, but the milk has been spilt already by then when we know if we get it wrong.
A wise wolf would take the initiative in this kind of case as the probability with conflicting revelations seems to favour the one who revealed first.
|
Well, as unpredictable as revealments are, in this case, we can get either wolves or the hunter revealing, because the others would have the sense not to, and the kill the hunter gets gives us some stable info as to their role and gets the heir out of the equation and on our side.
I'm all for a hunter-reveal.