Quote:
Originally Posted by Nessa Telrunya
My reasoning was that if a gifted is killed, the heir takes over. I thought we don't get a reveal on whoever the heir takes over for, but it would only make sense to call them an ordo. It wouldn't work for Shasta to say "no-role"
|
I hope not - I have imagine it the way that that's how he does it, simply writing "no-role", indeed, or something like that. I mean, you will know that the Heir is "activated", but you don't know what exactly happened...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loslote
Why thank you...also,
++Lottie
I hope all of you can figure out what that means.
|
Brilliant, well, as good lead as any, at least something is happening. I just hope it's not the case of what
Nessa said (quote above) - lynching our Gifted when we in fact don't want to would be really incredible stupidity.
In any case, as it was said, when lynching the Hunter, we will know for sure if you are not bluffing, and also if nothing else, we move on, so... well, fine. If so, for that matter, should we "vote" whom we'd like to see Hunted, or something like that? If even just for the record...
EDIT: x-ed more or less since my last